International Academy for Science & Technology Education and Research
( Publishers of High Quality Peer Reviewed International Research Journals )
IASTER publish various Journals in the broad and specific category related to all fields of Engineering & Technology, Management Studies, Computer & Information Technology, Bio-Technology, Sciences, Social Sciences, Humanities, Education, Library & Information Science, Media Studies etc. The Academicians and Researchers are welcome to be a Reviewer of their respective areas of specialization. Being a Reviewer of IASTER International Journals is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. IASTER follows a strict set of guidelines while accepting the applicant as a Reviewer of IASTER International Journals. The minimum set of qualifications for being a Reviewer is listed below:
Kindly submit your detailed profile via filling up online application given below:
Benefits to Reviewers
Being the Reviewer of fast growing International Journals is truly productive, pleasant and in fact prestigious which helps in add-on to the scientific world through the ways and guidelines given by experts in the relevant fields. Though, it is time consuming and often goes unobserved, there are some important rewards that make the Reviewers worthwhile. You will be entitled following benefits while being with us as a Reviewer of our Journal.
You are to read carefully various manuscripts in your area of importance and interest. This is the way you are routinely forced to keep yourself up-to-date while checking and suggesting the changes in manuscript.
This work helps to add in and provides a better way to create your identity as a well known expert in your field and may lead to increased invitations to speak at conferences or demand for invited research of your specialized area.
You will be among the contributors who will shape and decide the urgent ways as required with changing societal needs.
You will come across the latest research before everyone else and gives you a position of leadership in your research community.
Research articles provided by the Reviewers will be published with priority & concession.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
We need our Reviewers to be key figures in their professions to have some experience of publishing articles and papers. A reviewer's comment decides the acceptance or rejection of an article so they play an important role in peer review process. All the Reviewers are requested to test out the manuscripts submitted to them without any bias to increase the quality of our Journal. There is no hard and fast rule to analyze a manuscript and it depends upon the worthiness, quality and originality. While verifying the manuscript you have to go through following points:
Detailed examination and relevance of the manuscript as per author Guidelines.
Careful examination of purpose and objectives of the work carried out.
Correctness of the conclusions and recommendations along with up-to date References.
Copy editing and proof reading of the manuscripts in accordance with publishing standards especially with grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Coverage areas of the manuscript in relevance with the scope of Journal. Plagiarism related issues if any.
You have to give at least (minimum) three suggestions based on the Structure of the manuscript. In general there is no limit for the maximum inputs.
Good quality submissions that meet the journal's aims and scope, but which do not meet the specifications of the Special Issue call for papers, may be recommended to the Editor-in-Chief for consideration for publication as a regular paper.
You have complete authority to recommend or not to recommend manuscripts but final decision in case of sensitive titles about the inclusion or exclusion from the publications remains in the hands of Editor-In-Chief.